CO · rules
Colo. Code Jud. Conduct R. 4.2
Political and Campaign Activities of a Judge
Who is a Candidate for Retention
(A) A judicial candidate* in a retention public election* shall:
(1) act at all times in a manner consistent with the independence,* integrity,* and
impartiality* of the judiciary;
(2) comply with all applicable federal and state election, election campaign, and
election campaign fund-raising laws and regulations;
(3) review and approve the content of all campaign statements and materials produced
by the candidate or his or her campaign committee, as authorized by Rule 4.3, before their
dissemination; and
(4) take reasonable measures to ensure that other persons do not undertake on behalf
of the candidate activities, other than those described in Rule 4.3, that the candidate is
prohibited from doing by Rule 4.1.
ETHICS OPINIONS
The Colorado District Judges’ Association
(‘‘Association’’) may hire a public information
officer (‘‘PIO’’) to convey general information
to the public and discrete information, like issues impacting trial judges and trial courts, to
news media. Subject to the limits set forth in the
Code of Judicial Conduct (‘‘Code’’), the PIO
may also appear before deliberative bodies to
advocate positions designed to improve the welfare of trial courts and staff, the legal system,
and the administration of justice. If a judge
faces active opposition and is a candidate for
retention, the PIO may also help that judge
formulate a response to such opposition.
Though the PIO may not be subject to the
requirements of the Code, the Association’s
members in general, and especially its elected
officers, are responsible for ensuring that the
PIO’s conduct and statements comply with the
Code. Colo. J.E.A.B. Ad. Op. 19-01.
Judges standing for retention may not appear
on a television program in which a representative of the League of Women V oters would ask
them questions to help provide viewers with
more information about whether or not the
judges should be retained. Viewers might reasonably expect that the judge was seeking an
approval vote and might therefore understand
that the judge is engaging in campaign activity.
Colo. J.E.A.B. Op. 08-04.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
799ce2da1407e5145c97a0e403dda9f52f6f96246889c02b1918ac0e421f1c4b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.