CO · rules
Colo. Code Jud. Conduct R. 2.3
Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment
(A) A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office, including administrative duties,
without bias or prejudice.
(B) A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct
manifest bias or prejudice, or engage in harassment, including but not limited to bias,
prejudice, or harassment based upon race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity,
disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation, and shall not permit court staff, court officials, or others subject to the judge’s
direction and control to do so.
(C) A judge shall not engage in retaliation for reporting of misconduct under this Code
or other legal authority. The duty to refrain from retaliation includes retaliation against
current and former Judicial Branch personnel as well as attorneys and other members of
the public.
(D) A judge shall require lawyers in proceedings before the court to refrain from
manifesting bias or prejudice, or engaging in harassment, based upon attributes including
but not limited to race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age,
sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation, against
parties, witnesses, lawyers, or others.
(E) The restrictions of paragraphs (B) and (D) do not preclude judges or lawyers from
making legitimate reference to the listed factors, or similar factors, when they are relevant
to an issue in a proceeding.
History
Source: (C) and (D) amended, (E) added, and Comment [3] amended and adopted, effective June 3, 2021. COMMENT [1] A judge who manifests bias or prejudice in a proceeding impairs the fairness of the pro- ceeding and brings the judiciary into disrepute. [2] Examples of manifestations of bias or prejudice include but are not limited to epithets; slurs; demeaning nicknames; negative stereo- typing; attempted humor based upon stereo- types; threatening, intimidating, or hostile acts; suggestions of connections between race, eth- nicity, or nationality and crime; and irrelevant references to personal characteristics. Even fa- cial expressions and body language can convey to parties and lawyers in the proceeding, jurors, the media, and others an appearance of bias or prejudice. A judge must avoid conduct that may reasonably be perceived as prejudiced or bi- ased. [3] Harassment, as referred to in paragraphs (B) and (D), is verbal or physical conduct that denigrates or shows hostility or aversion toward a person on bases such as race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status, socioeco- nomic status, or political affiliation. [4] Sexual harassment includes but is not limited to sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that is unwelcome. ANNOTATION Public censure appropriate sanction for judge who voluntarily resigned after she ex- pressed views about criminal justice, police brutality, race, and racial bias, specifically while wearing her robe in court staff work areas and from the bench. In re Chase, 2021 CO 23, 485 P.3d 65.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
663b219a48cb3166d129a93029d22c7e1a834bb2282c59d060494b6238276f25
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.