CO · rules
Colo. Code Jud. Conduct R. 2.12
Supervisory Duties
(A) A judge shall require court staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge’s
direction and control to act in a manner consistent with the judge’s obligations under this
Code in the performance of their official duties or in the presence of the judge.
(B) A judge with supervisory authority for the performance of other judges shall take
reasonable measures to ensure that those judges properly discharge their judicial responsibilities, including the prompt disposition of matters before them.
(C) A judge should practice civility by being patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous, in dealings with court personnel, including chambers staff. A judge should not
engage in any type of harassment of court personnel. A judge should not engage in
retaliation for reporting allegations of such misconduct. A judge should seek to hold court
personnel who are subject to the judge’s control to similar standards in their own dealings
with other court personnel.
History
Source: (C) added, Comment [2] amended, and Comment [3] added and adopted, effective June 3, 2021; (A) amended and effective September 23, 2021 (Rule Change 2021(19)). COMMENT [1] A judge is responsible for his or her own conduct and for the conduct of others, such as staff, when those persons are acting at the judge’s direction or control. A judge may not direct court personnel to engage in conduct on the judge’s behalf or as the judge’s representa- tive when such conduct would violate the Code if undertaken by the judge. [2] A judge does not violate this rule through communication and actions reasonably related to performance management, including, but not limited to instruction, counseling, cor- rective criticism, evaluation, duty assignments, and discipline. [3] Public confidence in the judicial system depends upon timely justice. To promote the efficient administration of justice, a judge with supervisory authority must take the steps needed to ensure that judges under his or her supervision administer their workloads promptly. ETHICS OPINIONS Withdrawing Advisory Opinion 2020-02, the board determined that judges are not respon- sible under the Code for comments on political issues made by staff or for their participation in rallies and marches as long as the staff do not engage in such conduct in the performance of their official duties or in the judge’s presence. Colo. J.E.A.B. Ad. Op. 2021-03.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
e7a0b7018de67f6d8acc4c661a13b0222afcd050b103231f8bff9ba65522ad79
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.