CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. H:67
TRANSFER OF A FIREARM WITHOUT A BACKGROUND CHECK—PERMISSIBLE TRANSFER
The evidence presented in this case has raised the affirmative defense
of “permissible transfer” as a defense to [transfer of a firearm without a
background check] [accepting possession of a firearm without approval]
[insert a description of one of the other transfer offenses proscribed by
section 18-12-112].
The defendant’s conduct was legally authorized if:
[1. the transfer was of [an antique firearm] [a curio or relic].]
[1. the transfer was a bona fide gift or loan between immediate
family members (which are limited to spouses, parents,
children, siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, nieces,
nephews, first cousins, aunts, and uncles).]
[1. the transfer occurred [by operation of law] [because of the
death of a person for whom the prospective transferor was an
executor or administrator of an estate or a trustee of a trust
created in a will].]
[1. the transfer was temporary, and
2. it occurred while in the home of the unlicensed transferee, and
3. the unlicensed transferee was not prohibited from possessing
firearms, and
4. the unlicensed transferee reasonably believed that possession of
the firearm was necessary to prevent imminent death or serious
bodily injury to the unlicensed transferee.]
[1. the transfer was a temporary transfer of possession,
2. without transfer of ownership or a title to ownership,
3. which took place [at a shooting range located in or on premises
owned or occupied by a duly incorporated organization
organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in
firearms] [at a target firearm shooting competition under the
auspices of, or approved by, a state agency or a nonprofit
organization] [while hunting, fishing, target shooting, or
trapping], if the hunting, fishing, target shooting, or trapping]
was legal in all places where the unlicensed transferee
possessed the firearm, and the unlicensed transferee held any
license or permit that was required for such hunting, fishing,
target shooting, or trapping].
[1. the transfer was made to facilitate the repair or maintenance of
the firearm, and
2. all parties who possessed the firearm as a result of the transfer
could legally possess a firearm.]
[1. the transfer was a temporary transfer that occurred while in the
continuous presence of the owner of the firearm.]
[1. the transfer was a temporary transfer for not more than
seventy-two hours.]
[1. the transfer was from a person serving in the armed forces of
the United States who was to be deployed outside of the United
States within the next thirty days,
2. to a spouse, parent, child, sibling, grandparent, grandchild,
niece, nephew, first cousin, aunt, or uncle of the person.]
The prosecution has the burden to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by this defense. In
order to meet this burden of proof, the prosecution must disprove, beyond
a reasonable doubt, [at least one of] the above numbered condition[s].
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to meet this burden of proof, then the prosecution has failed to prove
the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by this defense, which
is an essential element of [transfer of a firearm without a background
check] [accepting possession of a firearm without approval] [insert a
description of one of the other transfer offenses proscribed by section 18-
12-112]. In that event, you must return a verdict of not guilty of [transfer of
a firearm without a background check] [accepting possession of a firearm
without approval] [insert a description of one of the other transfer offenses
proscribed by section 18-12-112].
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
met this burden of proof, then the prosecution has proved the defendant’s
conduct was not legally authorized by this defense. In that event, your
verdict concerning the charge of [transfer of a firearm without a
background check] [accepting possession of a firearm without approval]
[insert a description of one of the other transfer offenses proscribed by
section 18-12-112] must depend upon your determination whether the
prosecution has met its burden of proof with respect to the remaining
elements of that offense.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
daf71fbe36da31452400ed0f2ae397a8ec6784d6929e0ed6aa1194f073269103
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.