Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. H:66

UNLAWFULLY PROVIDING A HANDGUN OR FIREARM TO A JUVENILE OR PERMITTING A JUVENILE TO POSSESS A HANDGUN OR FIREARM—PHYSICAL HARM FROM ATTEMPT TO DISARM

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The evidence presented in this case has raised the affirmative defense

of “physical harm from attempt to disarm,” as a defense to [unlawfully

providing a [handgun] [firearm] to a juvenile] [permitting a juvenile to

possess a [handgun] [firearm]].

The defendant’s conduct was legally authorized if:

1. he [she] believed that the juvenile would physically harm him

[her] if he [she] attempted to disarm the juvenile or prevent the

juvenile from unlawfully possessing a handgun.

The prosecution has the burden to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,

that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by this defense. In

order to meet this burden of proof, the prosecution must disprove, beyond

a reasonable doubt, the above numbered condition.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to meet this burden of proof, then the prosecution has failed to prove

the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by this defense, which

is an essential element of [unlawfully providing a [handgun] [firearm] to a

juvenile] [permitting a juvenile to possess a [handgun] [firearm]]. In that

event, you must return a verdict of not guilty of [unlawfully providing a

[handgun] [firearm] to a juvenile] [permitting a juvenile to possess a

[handgun] [firearm]].

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

met this burden of proof, then the prosecution has proved the defendant’s

conduct was not legally authorized by this defense. In that event, your

verdict concerning the charge of [unlawfully providing a [handgun]

[firearm] to a juvenile] [permitting a juvenile to possess a [handgun]

[firearm]] must depend upon your determination whether the prosecution

has met its burden of proof with respect to the remaining elements of that

offense.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
358ca01e32f9e469df62672afd9ad48ea9ae909eb4c483872797a5171c42ff20
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.