Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. H:45.1

HUMAN TRAFFICKING—VICTIM OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The evidence presented in this case has raised the affirmative defense

of “victim of human trafficking,” as a defense to [human trafficking for

involuntary servitude] [human trafficking [of a minor] for sexual

servitude].

The defendant’s conduct was legally authorized if:

1. at the time of the offense, [he] [she] was a victim of [human

trafficking for involuntary servitude] [human trafficking for

sexual servitude], and

2. [he] [she] was forced or coerced into engaging in [human

trafficking for involuntary servitude] [human trafficking for

sexual servitude].

The prosecution has the burden to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,

that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by this defense. In

order to meet this burden of proof, the prosecution must disprove, beyond

a reasonable doubt, at least one of the above numbered conditions.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to meet this burden of proof, then the prosecution has failed to prove

the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by this defense, which

is an essential element of [human trafficking for involuntary servitude]

[human trafficking [of a minor] for sexual servitude]. In that event, you

must return a verdict of not guilty of [human trafficking for involuntary

servitude] [human trafficking [of a minor] for sexual servitude].

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

met this burden of proof, then the prosecution has proved the defendant’s

conduct was not legally authorized by this defense. In that event, your

verdict concerning the charge of [human trafficking for involuntary

servitude] [human trafficking [of a minor] for sexual servitude] must

depend upon your determination whether the prosecution has met its

burden of proof with respect to the remaining elements of that offense.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
ab59e0a7202ce72ae6f2feea6dd63ba8b539fe6b21176dfadeed28701cecd76f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.