Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. H:13

USE OF NON-DEADLY PHYSICAL FORCE (DEFENSE OF PERSON—OFFENSE WITH A MENS REA OF RECKLESSNESS, EXTREME INDIFFERENCE, OR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The evidence presented in this case has raised the question of self-defense with respect to [insert name(s) of offense(s)].

A person is justified in using physical force upon another person

without first retreating in order to defend himself [herself] [a third person]

from what he [she] reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of

unlawful physical force by that other person, and he [she] may use a

degree of force which he [she] reasonably believes to be necessary for that

purpose.

However, a person is not justified in using physical force if:

[with intent to cause bodily injury or death to another person, he

[she] provokes the use of unlawful physical force by that other

person.]

[he [she] is the initial aggressor; except that his [her] use of physical

force upon another person under the circumstances is justifiable if he

[she] withdraws from the encounter and effectively communicates to

the other person his [her] intent to do so, but the other person

nevertheless continues or threatens the use of unlawful physical

force.]

[the physical force involved is the product of an unauthorized

combat by agreement.]

[the use of physical force against another is based on the discovery of,

knowledge about, or potential disclosure of the victim’s actual or

perceived gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual

orientation, including but not limited to under circumstances in

which the victim makes an unwanted nonforcible romantic or sexual

advance toward the person.]

You have been instructed that the prosecution has the burden of

proving beyond a reasonable doubt all of the elements of [insert name(s) of

offense(s)], including that the defendant acted [recklessly] [with extreme

indifference] [in a criminally negligent manner].

You are further instructed that, with respect to [insert name(s) of

offense(s)], the prosecution does not have an additional burden to disprove

self-defense. You are instructed, though, that a person does not act

[recklessly] [with extreme indifference] [in a criminally negligent manner]

if his [her] conduct is legally justified as set forth above.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
e03617bdb1e6f201bba20da6fcebf0288450b4ee7bebb9e8a2dc1a05b1fbc5b3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.