CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. H:13
USE OF NON-DEADLY PHYSICAL FORCE (DEFENSE OF PERSON—OFFENSE WITH A MENS REA OF RECKLESSNESS, EXTREME INDIFFERENCE, OR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE)
The evidence presented in this case has raised the question of self-defense with respect to [insert name(s) of offense(s)].
A person is justified in using physical force upon another person
without first retreating in order to defend himself [herself] [a third person]
from what he [she] reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of
unlawful physical force by that other person, and he [she] may use a
degree of force which he [she] reasonably believes to be necessary for that
purpose.
However, a person is not justified in using physical force if:
[with intent to cause bodily injury or death to another person, he
[she] provokes the use of unlawful physical force by that other
person.]
[he [she] is the initial aggressor; except that his [her] use of physical
force upon another person under the circumstances is justifiable if he
[she] withdraws from the encounter and effectively communicates to
the other person his [her] intent to do so, but the other person
nevertheless continues or threatens the use of unlawful physical
force.]
[the physical force involved is the product of an unauthorized
combat by agreement.]
[the use of physical force against another is based on the discovery of,
knowledge about, or potential disclosure of the victim’s actual or
perceived gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual
orientation, including but not limited to under circumstances in
which the victim makes an unwanted nonforcible romantic or sexual
advance toward the person.]
You have been instructed that the prosecution has the burden of
proving beyond a reasonable doubt all of the elements of [insert name(s) of
offense(s)], including that the defendant acted [recklessly] [with extreme
indifference] [in a criminally negligent manner].
You are further instructed that, with respect to [insert name(s) of
offense(s)], the prosecution does not have an additional burden to disprove
self-defense. You are instructed, though, that a person does not act
[recklessly] [with extreme indifference] [in a criminally negligent manner]
if his [her] conduct is legally justified as set forth above.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
e03617bdb1e6f201bba20da6fcebf0288450b4ee7bebb9e8a2dc1a05b1fbc5b3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.