Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. D:06

CONVICTION OF FELONY—WITNESS OR DEFENDANT

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The credibility of a witness may be challenged by showing that the

witness has been convicted of a felony. A previous felony conviction is one

factor you may consider in determining the credibility of a witness. It is up

to you to determine what weight, if any, is to be given to such a conviction.

[The credibility of statements made by a person who did not testify in

court may be challenged by showing that the person has been convicted of

a felony. A previous conviction is one factor that you may consider in

determining the credibility of that person. You must determine the weight

to be given to any prior conviction when considering the credibility of that

person’s statement.]

[The defendant is to be tried for the crime charged in this case, and

no other. You may consider testimony of a previous conviction only in

determining the credibility of the defendant as a witness, and for no other

purpose. When the defendant testifies, his [her] credibility is to be

determined in the same manner as any other witness.]

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
a8f4ecce9f3cf7ba4b2c9b77f9acb1802dca9bafa7394db3d42d77e2b8641f03
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.