CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. B:03
INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO OPENING STATEMENTS (GENERAL)
Before we begin the trial, I would like to tell you about what will be
happening here.
The first step in the trial will be the opening statements. The
attorneys may make opening statements if they choose to do so.
[Defendant[’s attorney] may reserve opening statement until later in the
trial, or he [she] may decide not to make an opening statement at all.]
An opening statement is not evidence. Its purpose is to give you a
framework to help you understand the evidence as it is presented.
Next, the prosecution will offer evidence. Evidence is what the
witnesses say under oath, and items allowed as exhibits.
After the prosecution’s evidence, the defense may present evidence,
but is not required to do so. I want to remind you that the defendant is
presumed to be innocent. The prosecution must prove the defendant
guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant does not have to prove
his [her] innocence or call any witnesses or introduce any evidence.
After all the evidence has been presented, I will tell you the rules of
law which you must use in reaching your verdict. These rules of law are
called jury instructions. I will read them to you and you will be allowed to
take them with you to the jury room during your deliberations.
It is my job to decide what rules of law apply to the case. You must
follow all of the rules as I explain them to you. You cannot follow some
and ignore others. Even if you disagree or do not understand the reasons
for some of the rules, you must follow them. You will then apply these
rules to the facts you have determined from the evidence. In this way you
will decide whether the prosecution has proven the guilt of the defendant
beyond a reasonable doubt.
After you have heard all the evidence and the jury instructions, the
prosecution and the defense may make their closing arguments. Because
the prosecution has the burden of proof, it will have the opportunity to
reply to any closing argument made by the defense. Like opening
statements, closing arguments are not evidence. Their purpose is to
remind you of the evidence that was presented during the trial and to
argue why you should return a verdict of either not guilty or guilty.
After the closing arguments, you will then go to the jury room to
deliberate on a verdict. Your role as jurors is to decide what the facts are,
and your decision must be based only upon the evidence that was
presented during the trial.
At times during the trial, the attorneys may make objections. This
means that the attorney is asking me to decide a particular legal issue.
It is proper for an attorney to object to things which he or she believes
should not be presented as evidence. When an objection is made, I have
two choices. I can disagree and overrule the objection, or I can agree and
sustain the objection.
Do not concern yourselves with the reasons for my decisions about
any objections. You must not let yourself be influenced in any way by the
objections or my rulings on the objections.
If I overrule an objection to a question, the witness may answer. If I
sustain an objection to a question, the witness may not answer. You must
not consider the question for any purpose or guess how the witness might
have answered.
If I overrule an objection to an exhibit, it will be allowed into
evidence. If I sustain an objection to an exhibit, it will not be allowed into
evidence and you must not consider it for any purpose.
At times I may instruct you to disregard statements you have already
heard or things you have already seen. You must treat them as if you had
never heard or seen them. You must not consider them for any purpose.
During the trial I may need to talk with the attorneys out of your
hearing about questions of law. Sometimes you may be asked to leave the
courtroom or wait in the jury room while we discuss these things. We will
try to limit these interruptions as much as possible. As a judge, I do not
have any opinions either for or against anyone involved in this case. You
must not think that I do, based on any rulings that I make or anything that
I say or do during this trial.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
05bcfbfa834165186ef8eea9e20d8ac2b49038f8bca0914943da5ce59dbcffcc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.