CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 9-3:35
INTERFERENCE WITH LAWFUL DISTRIBUTION OF NEWSPAPERS
The elements of the crime of interference with lawful distribution of
newspapers are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. obtained or exerted control over more than five copies of an
edition of a newspaper from a newspaper distribution
container owned or leased by the newspaper publisher,
4. with the intent,
5. to prevent other individuals from reading that edition of the
newspaper, and
6. there was a notice on the newspaper or on the newspaper
distribution container that possession of more than five copies
with intent to prevent other individuals from reading that
edition of the newspaper was illegal.
[7. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of interference with lawful distribution of
newspapers.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of interference with lawful
distribution of newspapers.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
0164d01dadddc6e10967359d4511d0f13bc977c08bb840f275ea39a49f95a0fc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.