CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 9-3:31
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CRIME (CLONING EQUIPMENT; AIDING OR ABETTING)
The elements of the crime of unlawful use of telecommunications
crime (cloning equipment; aiding or abetting) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. aided, abetted, advised, or encouraged one or more persons
who,
4. knowingly,
5. used cloning equipment to intercept signals, including signals
transmitted to or from cellular phones, between a
telecommunications provider and persons using
telecommunications services or between persons using
telecommunications services; or used cloning equipment to
create a cloned cellular phone.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of telecommunications crime (cloning equipment;
aiding or abetting).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of telecommunications crime
(cloning equipment; aiding or abetting).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
c4efcd0baeadcebc3e97ef7321f59e0ef18ff4ca6c4f335f1741ef31a6be115b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.