Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 9-3:12

ABUSE OF TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH SERVICE (DIVULGING MESSAGE)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of abuse of telephone and telegraph service

(divulging message) are:

1. That the defendant

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. was an employee of a telegraph or telephone company, and

4. knowingly,

5. divulged the contents or the purport of any message or part

thereof sent or intended to be sent to any person other than one

to whom said message was sent or person authorized to receive

the same.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of abuse of telephone and telegraph service (divulging

message).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of abuse of telephone and

telegraph service (divulging message).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
64016e970240d5fa84ab9ba15cc428ec12f6c3e3e28de1a79fcafa42d50ba544
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.