Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 9-3:08

EAVESDROPPING (KNOWINGLY OVERHEARING OR RECORDING)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of eavesdropping (knowingly overhearing

or recording) are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. was not visibly present during a conversation or discussion,

and

4. knowingly,

5. overheard or recorded such conversation or discussion without

the consent of at least one of the principal parties thereto, or

attempted to do so.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of eavesdropping (knowingly overhearing or

recording).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of eavesdropping (knowingly

overhearing or recording).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
4cee2d7b4969025021ae80d5dfe8d214ec1a768540cf0a6b6cfab4ed12e50d2d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.