Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 9-3:05

WIRETAPPING (TAPPING OR INTERCEPTING DEVICE)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of wiretapping (tapping or intercepting

device) are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. was not a sender or intended receiver of a telephone or

telegraph communication, and

4. knowingly,

5. tapped or made a connection with any telephone or telegraph

line, wire, cable, or instrument belonging to another or with

any electronic, mechanical, or other device belonging to another

or installed any device whether connected or not which permits

the interception of messages.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of wiretapping (tapping or intercepting device).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of wiretapping (tapping or

intercepting device).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
0c4a1f7f4234b56b7cedd2d779acfb3c92d55ee6f6b7a73071164a71f61524e5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
COLJI-Crim. 9-3:05 — WIRETAPPING (TAPPING OR INTERCEP… · binding.law