CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 9-3:03
WIRETAPPING (INTENTIONALLY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMMITTING, AIDING, OR ABETTING AN UNLAWFUL ACT)
The elements of the crime of wiretapping (intentionally, for the
purpose of committing, aiding, or abetting an unlawful act) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was not a sender or intended receiver of a telephone or
telegraph communication, and
4. intentionally,
5. overheard, read, took, copied, or recorded a telephone,
telegraph, or electronic communication for the purpose of
committing or aiding or abetting the commission of the
unlawful act of [insert language identifying the “unlawful
act[s]”].
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of wiretapping, (intentionally, for the purpose of
committing, aiding, or abetting an unlawful act).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of wiretapping (intentionally, for
the purpose of intentionally committing, aiding, or abetting an unlawful
act).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
7e4bedca311ea9d82faec0243acc40f749fcb24f68b169e8ed7add9b3a1646dd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.