CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 9-1:74
INTERFERENCE WITH A FUNERAL (PUBLIC PROPERTY)
The elements of the crime of interference with a funeral (public
property) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowing a funeral was being conducted,
4. refused to leave any public property within one hundred feet of
the funeral site upon the request of a public official with
authority over the property or upon the request of a peace
officer, and
5. the public official or peace officer making the request had
reasonable grounds to believe that defendant had violated a
rule or regulation applicable to that property, or a statute or
local ordinance.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of interference with a funeral (public property).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of interference with a funeral
(public property).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
f5f5bc0dfdd2e5b746f1dd0cc656921409cb2fd45f51321e5beda1aacbd25d56
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.