CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 8-4:04
OFFICIAL OPPRESSION (SUBJECTING ANOTHER TO MISTREATMENT)
The elements of the crime of official oppression (subjecting another to
mistreatment) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was a public servant, and
4. while acting or purporting to act in an official capacity or
taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity,
5. with actual knowledge,
6. that his [her] conduct was illegal,
7. subjected another to arrest, detention, search, seizure,
mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, or lien.
[8. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of official oppression (subjecting another to
mistreatment).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of official oppression (subjecting
another to mistreatment).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
24bd8e1cdc3f6894a53fbcc354297b0e15faf0ae20786989e85709c98562006f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.