CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 8-4:02
MISUSE OF OFFICIAL INFORMATION (SPECULATE OR WAGER)
The elements of the crime of misuse of official information (speculate
or wager) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was a public servant, and
4. in contemplation of official action by himself [herself] or by a
governmental unit with which he [she] was associated or in
reliance on information to which he [she] had access in his [her]
official capacity and which had not been made public,
5. speculated or wagered on the basis of such information or
official action.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of misuse of official information (speculate or wager).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of misuse of official information
(speculate or wager).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
f474c6a14d20a55af54b2283b398257a20a83d373935d03d0058ffcfca5b55b6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.