CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 8-4:01
MISUSE OF OFFICIAL INFORMATION (PECUNIARY INTEREST)
The elements of the crime of misuse of official information (pecuniary
interest) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was a public servant, and
4. in contemplation of official action by himself [herself] or by a
governmental unit with which he [she] was associated or in
reliance on information to which he [she] had access in his [her]
official capacity and which had not been made public,
5. acquired a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction, or
enterprise which might be affected by such information or
official action.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of misuse of official information (pecuniary interest).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of misuse of official information
(pecuniary interest).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
57e6cb151067bdb08bfb7257a67b9c07c61db0cc5adae49440c7f6f21735127a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.