CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 8-3:04
COMPENSATION FOR PAST OFFICIAL BEHAVIOR (SOLICITING OR ACCEPTING A PECUNIARY BENEFIT)
The elements of the crime of compensation for past official behavior
(soliciting or accepting a pecuniary benefit) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. solicited, accepted, or agreed to accept any pecuniary benefit,
4. as compensation for giving, as a public servant, a decision,
opinion, recommendation, or vote favorable to another or for
otherwise exercising a discretion in his [her] favor,
5. whether or not he [she] in so doing violated his [her] duty.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of compensation for past official behavior (soliciting
or accepting a pecuniary benefit).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of compensation for past official
behavior (soliciting or accepting a pecuniary benefit).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
f3c647d200899cc7c563bda88005ec6f63ba91cd05985643233f0696b96de342
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.