CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 7-4:08
KEEPING A PLACE OF CHILD PROSTITUTION (CONTINUED USE)
The elements of the crime of keeping a place of child prostitution
(continued use) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. had or exercised control over the use of any place which offered
seclusion or shelter for the practice of prostitution, and
4. permitted the continued use of the place for the purpose of
prostitution of a child or by a child,
5. after becoming aware of facts or circumstances from which he
[she] should reasonably have known that the place was being
used for purposes of such prostitution.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of keeping a place of child prostitution (continued
use).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of keeping a place of child
prostitution (continued use).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
3e25486c41054ef70aa85066910a5303a5c02a1d46a2278ac9e8d32425dc1351
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.