CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 7-1:06.5.INT
DISCLOSING A PRIVATE INTIMATE IMAGE OR INTIMATE DIGITAL DEPICTION FOR HARASSMENT—INTERROGATORY (AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES)
If you find the defendant not guilty of disclosing a private intimate
image or intimate digital depiction for harassment, you should disregard
this instruction and sign the verdict form to indicate your not guilty
verdict.
If, however, you find the defendant guilty of disclosing a private
intimate image or intimate digital depiction for harassment, you should
sign the verdict form to indicate your finding of guilt, and answer the
following verdict question on the verdict form:
Were there aggravating circumstances? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)
There were aggravating circumstances only if:
1. the defendant disclosed the private intimate image or intimate
digital depiction, and
2. the disclosure posed an imminent and serious threat to the
depicted individual’s safety or the safety of the depicted
individual’s immediate family, and
3. the defendant knew or reasonably should have known of the
imminent and serious threat.
The prosecution has the burden to prove each numbered condition
beyond a reasonable doubt.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
met this burden, you should mark “Yes” in the appropriate place, and have
the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to meet this burden, you should mark “No” in the appropriate place,
and have the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
8a0f75dfe0ce3f7c699fd3e3cfbe50e3445cf641de17dbe37158f08c4230cf4d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.