Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 5.5:07.8

CYBERCRIME (ENCODING MACHINE)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of cybercrime (encoding machine) are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. knowingly,

4. directly or indirectly used an encoding machine to place

information encoded on a payment card onto a different

payment card,

5. without the permission of the authorized user of the payment

card from which the information being reencoded was

obtained,

6. with the intent,

7. to defraud the authorized user, the issuer of the authorized

user’s payment card, or a merchant.

[8. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of cybercrime (encoding machine).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of cybercrime (encoding

machine).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
46851223dd18465a4e747069f6dc4421fd8dae3c3021916c5fdba9e03c684b42
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
COLJI-Crim. 5.5:07.8 — CYBERCRIME (ENCODING MACHINE) · binding.law