CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-9:05.5.INT
IDENTITY THEFT—INTERROGATORY (THREE OR MORE DEVICES)
If you find the defendant not guilty of identity theft, you should
disregard this instruction and sign the verdict form to indicate your not
guilty verdict.
If, however, you find the defendant guilty of identity theft, you
should sign the verdict form to indicate your finding of guilt, and answer
the following verdict question on the verdict form:
Did the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the
defendant possessed three or more financial devices or the personal
or financial identifying information of three or more persons?
(Answer “Yes” or “No”)
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
met this burden, you should mark “Yes” in the appropriate place, and have
the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to meet this burden, you should mark “No” in the appropriate place,
and have the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
3a720b38c20fd245b2b08b77ce4f56c8e4f5a865b0b97744d0a9142f21ac6223
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.