Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 5-9:04

IDENTITY THEFT (FINANCIAL DEVICE OR EXTENSION OF CREDIT)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of identity theft ([financial device]

[extension of credit]) are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. knowingly,

4. possessed the personal identifying information or financial

identifying information of another,

5. without permission or lawful authority,

6. to use in applying for or completing an application for a

financial device or other extension of credit.

[7. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of identity theft ([financial device] [extension of

credit]).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of identity theft ([financial device]

[extension of credit]).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
e0e3f8b1014d314cc4ab497ac602931c7f88d9f7b59887a6e18f1721f71a6dee
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
COLJI-Crim. 5-9:04 — IDENTITY THEFT (FINANCIAL DEVICE… · binding.law