CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-7:03.SP
UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION DEVICE—SPECIAL INSTRUCTION (NOTICE)
The sending of a notice in writing by registered or certified mail,
return receipt requested, duly stamped and addressed to such account
holder at his [her] last address known to the issuer, evidenced by a signed
returned receipt signed by the account holder, gives rise to a permissible
inference that the notice was received.
A permissible inference allows, but does not require, you to find a
fact from proof of another fact or facts, if that conclusion is justified by the
evidence as a whole. It is entirely your decision to determine what weight
shall be given the evidence.
You must bear in mind that the prosecution always has the burden of
proving each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, and that a
permissible inference does not shift that burden to the defendant.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
3e011d23607fed3f09be8cb89fe5ac1fb574b21f2889da8611712a849cbced6e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.