CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-5:09
ISSUANCE OF A DUPLICATE RECEIPT NOT MARKED
The elements of the crime of issuance of a duplicate receipt not
marked are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was a warehouse, or an officer, agent, or servant of a
warehouse, and
4. issued or aided in issuing a duplicate or additional negotiable
receipt for goods knowing that a former negotiable receipt for
the same goods or any part of them was outstanding and
uncancelled,
5. without placing upon the face thereof the word “duplicate.”
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of issuance of a duplicate receipt not marked.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of issuance of a duplicate receipt
not marked.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
34fabb374293d4a1d97999c58bb8fec1bbaa5d14ee3798ae35ba04d17695c531
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.