Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 5-5:07

ISSUANCE OF A FRAUDULENT RECEIPT

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of issuance of a fraudulent receipt are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. was a warehouse, or an officer, agent, or servant of a

warehouse, and

4. issued or aided in issuing a receipt,

5. knowing that the goods for which the receipt had been issued

had not been actually received by the warehouse, or were not

under the warehouse’s actual control at the time of issuing the

receipt.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of issuance of a fraudulent receipt.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of issuance of a fraudulent

receipt.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
8323fe5a194f7491d3b4cd844c7239eebcf5eb610679ba08cbed9759956b45d7
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.