CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-4:08
RIGGING A PUBLICLY EXHIBITED CONTEST (KNOWLEDGE OF RIGGING)
The elements of the crime of rigging a publicly exhibited contest
(knowledge of rigging) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. engaged in, sponsored, produced, judged, or otherwise
participated in a publicly exhibited or advertised contest,
5. knowing that the contest was not being conducted in
compliance with the rules and usages purporting to govern it,
by reason of any person committing the offense of rigging a
publicly exhibited contest ([benefit or threat] [tampering]
[soliciting or accepting]).
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of rigging a publicly exhibited contest (knowledge of
rigging).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you
should find the defendant not guilty of rigging a publicly exhibited contest
(knowledge of rigging).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
163f0bc0e51ea411f2ebea6bedbe0f4b7f68e237b39ab2217d39077a9dfbb303
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.