CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-3:14
PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES (STRIKE OR LOCKOUT)
The elements of the crime of prohibited practice by a private
employment agency (strike or lockout) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. was a private employment agency, or an employee of such
agency, and
5. sent an applicant, or caused an applicant to be sent, to any
place where a strike or lockout existed or was impending,
6. without notifying the applicant of the circumstances.
[7. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of prohibited practice by a private employment
agency (strike or lockout).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of prohibited practice by a private
employment agency (strike or lockout).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
e608dfb89cce13ef215d2b4bf5fa4cfa20323b7e6df7825b185c4f29ff2037a6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.