CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-3:08
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH A LIEN WAIVER FOR A CONSTRUCTION LOAN
The elements of the crime of noncompliance with a lien waiver for a
construction loan are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. signed a lien waiver for a construction loan [that contained a
statement, by the defendant, providing in substance that all
debts owed to any third party by the defendant, and relating to
the goods or services covered by the waiver of lien rights, had
been paid or would be timely paid], and
5. failed to timely pay any debt resulting from a construction
agreement covered by the waiver.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of noncompliance with a lien waiver for a
construction loan.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of noncompliance with a lien
waiver for a construction loan.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
77ad5452481a194a17177f3788584920c522f64212b8d25b796a3ede99cc059c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.