CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 5-2:13
ISSUING A FALSE FINANCIAL STATEMENT (REPRESENTING IN WRITING)
The elements of the crime of issuing a false financial statement
(representing in writing) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. with intent,
4. to defraud,
5. represented in writing that a written instrument purporting to
describe another person’s financial condition or ability to pay
as of a prior date was accurate with respect to that person’s
current financial condition or ability to pay,
6. knowing the instrument was materially false in that respect and
reasonably relied upon.
[7. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of issuing a false financial statement (representing in
writing).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you
should find the defendant not guilty of issuing a false financial statement
(representing in writing).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
7d93a3b863ce95071bd9641920c40ec7aab7e2824d1311d0782cb05c2c7216a0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.