Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 5-2:09.INT

DEFRAUDING A DEBTOR—INTERROGATORY (AMOUNT OWING ON NOTE OR CONTRACT)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

If you find the defendant not guilty of defrauding a debtor, you

should disregard this instruction and sign the verdict form to indicate your

not guilty verdict.

If, however, you find the defendant guilty of defrauding a debtor,

you should sign the verdict form to indicate your finding of guilt, and

answer the following verdict question[s] on the verdict form. [Although

you may answer “No” to more than one question, you may not answer

“Yes” to more than one question. Further, if you answer “Yes” to any

question, you should not answer the other question[s].]:

1. Was the amount owing on the note or contract less than three

hundred dollars? (Answer “Yes” or No”)

2. Was the amount owing on the note or contract three hundred

dollars or more but less than one thousand dollars? (Answer

“Yes” or No”)

[3. Was the amount owing on the note or contract one thousand

dollars or more but less than two thousand dollars? (Answer

“Yes” or No”)]

[4. Was the amount owing on the note or contract two thousand

dollars or more but less than five thousand dollars? (Answer

“Yes” or No”)]

[5. Was the amount owing on the note or contract five thousand

dollars or more but less than twenty thousand dollars? (Answer

“Yes” or No”)]

[6. Was the amount owing on the note or contract twenty

thousand dollars or more but less than one hundred thousand

dollars? (Answer “Yes” or No”)]

[7. Was the amount owing on the note or contract one hundred

thousand dollars or more but less than one million dollars?

(Answer “Yes” or No”)]

[8. Was the amount owing on the note or contract one million

dollars or more? (Answer “Yes” or No”)]

The prosecution has the burden to prove the amount owing on the

note or contract beyond a reasonable doubt.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

met this burden, you should mark “Yes” in the appropriate place, and have

the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to meet this burden, you should mark “No” in the appropriate place,

and have the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
aef95f432acda83d760e7562a8bfd56f6825aa65447f3fa6a19613f86769757e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
COLJI-Crim. 5-2:09.INT — DEFRAUDING A DEBTOR—INTERROG… · binding.law