Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 42:48

FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF SPILL

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of failure to give notice of spill are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. was the driver of a motor vehicle transporting hazardous

materials as cargo, and

4. the vehicle was involved in a hazardous materials spill,

whether intentional or unintentional, and

5. the defendant failed to give immediate notice of the location of

such spill and such other information as necessary to the

nearest law enforcement agency.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of failure to give notice of spill.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of failure to give notice of spill.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
0ecbb928711dd9272e0dd31f52806bfcf1c4e915fd41f8ec928d12ad8e51a51c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.