Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 42:01.8

TAMPERING WITH AN APPROVED IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE (RESTRICTED)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of tampering with an approved ignition

interlock device (restricted) are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. was a person whose privilege to drive was restricted to the

operation of a motor vehicle equipped with an approved

ignition interlock device, and

4. drove a motor vehicle in which an approved ignition interlock

device was installed, and

5. knew that any person had intercepted, bypassed, or interfered

with the approved ignition interlock device.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of tampering with an approved ignition interlock

device (restricted).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of tampering with an approved

ignition interlock device (restricted).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
70654c214307b081c7def67457d21b203751bf7a31b95fb399dfed811af0d2c4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.