CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 4-6:02
UNLAWFUL TRAFFICKING IN UNLAWFULLY TRANSFERRED ARTICLES
The elements of the crime of unlawful trafficking in unlawfully
transferred articles are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly, or when he [she] reasonably should have had such
knowledge,
4. advertised, offered for sale or resale, sold or resold, distributed,
or possessed for the purpose of advertising, offering for sale or
resale, selling or reselling, or distributing,
5. any article that had been unlawfully transferred for sale, as
defined in these instructions.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of unlawful trafficking in unlawfully transferred
articles.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you
should find the defendant not guilty of unlawful trafficking in unlawfully
transferred articles.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
f15a2ad7594ca633fd98cd40a3809259d816d58f101a8dfc937ff0d35c2f3e6d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.