CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 4-4:34
UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A THEFT DETECTION SHIELDING DEVICE OR A THEFT DETECTION DEACTIVATING DEVICE
The elements of the crime of unlawful possession of a theft detection
shielding device or a theft detection deactivating device are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. possessed a theft detection shielding device or a theft detection
deactivating device,
[4. with the intent to use the device possessed in the commission of
an offense involving theft.]
[4. with the knowledge that some person intended to use the
device possessed in the commission of an offense involving
theft.]
[5. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of unlawful possession of a theft detection shielding
or theft detection deactivating device.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of unlawful possession of a theft
detection shielding or theft detection deactivating device.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
6ae81ba2a064dbd9b7da77f12e30c0ab7eaaf7d060c57a13c87798a88b81806b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.