CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 4-4:33
MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE OF A THEFT DETECTION SHIELDING OR A THEFT DETECTION DEACTIVATING DEVICE
The elements of the crime of manufacturing, distributing, or selling a
theft detection shielding device or a theft detection deactivating device are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. manufactured, distributed, or sold a theft detection shielding
device or a theft detection deactivating device,
5. with knowledge that some person intended to use the device in
the commission of an offense involving theft.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of manufacturing, distributing, or selling a theft
detection shielding device or a theft detection deactivating device.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of manufacturing, distributing, or
selling a theft detection shielding device or a theft detection deactivating
device.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
d0eb2e55c62820cc186a198094e3bce47677ca910ee0d8049b57bbc228d3774e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.