Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 4-4:31.5.INT

THEFT OF MEDICAL RECORDS OR MEDICAL INFORMATION—INTERROGATORY (UNAUTHORIZED PERSON)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

If you find the defendant not guilty of theft of medical records or

medical information, you should disregard this instruction and sign the

verdict form to indicate your not guilty verdict.

If, however, you find the defendant guilty of theft of medical records

or medical information, you should sign the verdict form to indicate your

finding of guilt, and answer the following verdict question on the verdict

form:

Did the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the

defendant stole or disclosed the medical record or information to an

unauthorized person? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

met this burden, you should mark “Yes” in the appropriate place, and have

the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to meet this burden, you should mark “No” in the appropriate place,

and have the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
d2c4afc100b1715ce6a3d80ffeb71683e13964e0efe07945022f92722957557b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
COLJI-Crim. 4-4:31.5.INT — THEFT OF MEDICAL RECORDS O… · binding.law