CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 4-4:20
MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT IN THE SECOND DEGREE (ALTERED OR DISGUISED)
The elements of the crime of motor vehicle theft in the second degree
(altered or disguised) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. obtained, exercised control over, received, or retained the
motor vehicle of another person, and
5. [he] [she] knew or should reasonably have known that the act
was without authorization or was by threat or deception, and
6. [he] [she] attempted to alter or disguise, or altered or disguised,
the appearance of the motor vehicle.
[7. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of motor vehicle theft in the second degree (altered or
disguised).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of motor vehicle theft in the
second degree (altered or disguised).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
2000fb6103afa5e1f3ab593d27fca2e7410a5297acafbfd2872086796f50e8d7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.