Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 4-4:18

THEFT OF TRADE SECRETS

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of theft of trade secrets are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

3. with intent,

4. to deprive or withhold from the owner thereof the control of a

trade secret, or to appropriate a trade secret to his [her] own use

or the use of another,

5. stole or disclosed a trade secret to an unauthorized person, or,

without authority, made or caused to be made a copy of an

article representing a trade secret.

[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of theft of trade secrets.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of theft of trade secrets.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
612f2cbdd4b2b4574f62fc3bff86cae4fe98ba7bf1d78fedc868f6ada8cad3d7
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.