Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 4-4:16.INT

THEFT (MULTIPLE THEFTS AGGREGATED AND CHARGED IN THE SAME COUNT; THEFTS FROM THE SAME PERSON PURSUANT TO ONE SCHEME OR COURSE OF CONDUCT AGGREGATED AND CHARGED IN THE SAME COUNT)—INTERROGATORY (AGGREGATE VALUE)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

If you find the defendant not guilty of theft ([multiple thefts] [same

person; one scheme or course of conduct]), you should disregard this

instruction and sign the verdict form to indicate your not guilty verdict.

If, however, you find the defendant guilty of theft ([multiple thefts]

[same person; one scheme or course of conduct]), you should sign the

verdict form to indicate your finding of guilt, and answer the following

verdict question[s] on the verdict form. [Although you may answer “No”

to more than one question, you may not answer “Yes” to more than one

question. Further, if you answer “Yes” to any question, you should not

answer the other question[s].]

1. Was the aggregate value of the things involved in the thefts

[insert a description of the amount(s) from section 18-4-401(2)]?

(Answer “Yes” or “No”)

[2. Was the aggregate value of the things involved in the thefts

[insert a description of the amount(s) from section 18-4-401(2)]?

(Answer “Yes” or “No”)]

[3. Was the aggregate value of the things involved in the thefts

[insert a description of the amount(s) from section 18-4-401(2)]?

(Answer “Yes” or “No”)]

The prosecution has the burden to prove the aggregate value of the

things involved beyond a reasonable doubt.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

met this burden, you should mark “Yes” in the appropriate place, and have

the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to meet this burden, you should mark “No” in the appropriate

place(s), and have the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict

form.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
897b2669576b6e43e8d6ee7ee5753c41a554c5eee00105445d5e4f4a0a653f92
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
COLJI-Crim. 4-4:16.INT — THEFT (MULTIPLE THEFTS AGGRE… · binding.law