Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 4-4:08.5.INT

THEFT—INTERROGATORY (PUBLIC BENEFITS)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

If you find the defendant not guilty of theft, you should disregard

this instruction and sign the verdict form to indicate your not guilty

verdict.

If, however, you find the defendant guilty of theft, you must then

calculate the value of the defendant’s theft.

The value of the defendant’s theft is the difference between the value

of the public benefit received and the value of the public benefit for which

the defendant was eligible.

Once you calculate the value of the defendant’s theft, you should

answer the following verdict questions on the verdict form. Although you

may answer “No” to more than one question, you may not answer “Yes” to

more than one question. Further, if you answer “Yes” to any question, you

should not answer the other questions.

1. Was the value of the defendant’s theft less than three hundred

dollars? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)

2. Was the value of the defendant’s theft three hundred dollars or

more but less than one thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)

[3. Was the value of the defendant’s theft one thousand dollars or

more but less than two thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)]

[4. Was the value of the defendant’s theft two thousand dollars or

more but less than five thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)]

[5. Was the value of the defendant’s theft five thousand dollars or

more but less than twenty thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)]

[6. Was the value of the defendant’s theft twenty thousand dollars

or more but less than one hundred thousand dollars? (Answer

“Yes” or “No”)]

[7. Was the value of the defendant’s theft one hundred thousand

dollars or more but less than one million dollars? (Answer

“Yes” or “No”)]

[8. Was the value of the defendant’s theft one million dollars or

more? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)]

The prosecution has the burden to prove the value of the defendant’s

theft beyond a reasonable doubt.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
aa5557749d890c86c316e23cf11357619d3ebfd1e66328bf8b65c7b975380817
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.