Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 4-1:04.INT

SECOND DEGREE ARSON—INTERROGATORY (VALUE OF PROPERTY)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

If you find the defendant not guilty of second degree arson, you

should disregard this instruction and sign the verdict form to indicate your

not guilty verdict.

If, however, you find the defendant guilty of second degree arson,

you should sign the verdict form to indicate your finding of guilt, and

answer the following verdict questions on the verdict form. Although you

may answer “No” to more than one question, you may not answer “Yes” to

more than one question. Further, if you answer “Yes” to any question, you

should not answer the other questions.

1. Was the value of the property less than three hundred dollars?

(Answer “Yes” or “No”)

2. Was the value of the property three hundred dollars or more

but less than one thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)

[3. Was the value of the property one thousand dollars or more but

less than two thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)]

[4. Was the value of the property two thousand dollars or more

but less than five thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or “No”)]

[5. Was the value of the property five thousand dollars or more

but less than twenty thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)]

[6. Was the value of the property twenty thousand dollars or more

but less than one hundred thousand dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)]

[7. Was the value of the property one hundred thousand dollars or

more but less than one million dollars? (Answer “Yes” or

“No”)]

[8. Was the value of the property one million dollars or more?

(Answer “Yes” or “No”)]

The prosecution has the burden to prove the value of the property

beyond a reasonable doubt.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

met this burden, you should mark “Yes” in the appropriate place, and have

the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to meet this burden, you should mark “No” in the appropriate place,

and have the foreperson sign the designated line of the verdict form.

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
c8ffcee539061681183c0bc7ccdea043913fc2b89f4da8b4918dcef580bf88f9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.