CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 3-4:67
FAILURE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER (E-MAIL)
The elements of the crime of failure to register as a sex offender (e-mail) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was required to register as a sex offender, and
4. having been convicted of a child sex crime,
5. failed to register an e-mail address (other than an e-mail
address that the defendant’s employer—which was an entity
not owned or operated by the defendant—provided for use
primarily in the course of the defendant’s employment, which
identified the employer by name, initials, or other commonly
recognized identifier), instant-messaging identity, or chat room
identity prior to using the address or identity.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of failure to register as a sex offender (e-mail).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of failure to register as a sex
offender (e-mail).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
b0a694a13e2c4243f67af6cd57f153ad58576775ec23cb97fe41ccb58bd34cee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.