CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 3-4:55
INVASION OF PRIVACY FOR SEXUAL GRATIFICATION
The elements of invasion of privacy for sexual gratification are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. observed or took a photograph of another person’s intimate
parts,
5. without the person’s consent,
6. in a situation where the person observed or photographed had
a reasonable expectation of privacy,
7. for the purpose of the observer’s own sexual gratification.
[8. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of invasion of privacy for sexual gratification.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of invasion of privacy for sexual
gratification.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
839ee052a97179877a4f9a4dedcec5336eff475de0e35d936e2cf07399a5f7a7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.