CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 20:49
CONFLICT OF INTEREST (LICENSE)
The elements of the crime of conflict of interest (license) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. was a member of the Colorado limited gaming control
commission; a spouse of a member; an ancestor or descendant
of a member, including a natural child, child by adoption, or
stepchild; a brother or sister of the whole or half blood of a
member; or an uncle, aunt, nephew, or niece of the whole blood
of a member, and
4. had an interest of any kind in a license issued pursuant to the
Limited Gaming Act of 1991 or owned or had any interest in
property in any county where limited gaming was permitted.
[5. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of conflict of interest (license).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of conflict of interest (license).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
bb0385f460ba8c44113832418e910623cd75b10f59af29dc3c0a3cfaf9efcbd3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.