CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 20:40
TAMPERING WITH CARD GAME
The elements of the crime of tampering with card game are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. was playing a licensed game in licensed gaming premises, and
5. dealt, conducted, carried on, operated, or exposed for play,
6. a game played with cards or a mechanical device, or any
combination of games or devices,
7. which had in any manner been marked or tampered with or
placed in a condition or operated in a manner the result of
which tended to deceive the public or tended to alter the
normal random selection of characteristics or the normal chance
of the game which could determine or alter the result of the
game.
[8. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of tampering with card game.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of tampering with card game.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
375de2ba3f4812b9a4d0022f983f384ceafb61c799e4b74a58876b3294299930
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.