Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

COLJI-Crim. 20:13

GAMING FRAUD (USE OF KNOWLEDGE)

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The elements of the crime of gaming fraud (use of knowledge) are:

1. That the defendant,

2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,

[3. placed, increased, or decreased a bet or determined the course

of play,

4. after acquiring knowledge, not available to all players, of the

outcome of the game or any event that affected the outcome of

the game or which was the subject of the bet.]

[3. aided anyone in acquiring knowledge, not available to all

players, of the outcome of a game or any event that affected the

outcome of the game or which was the subject of a bet,

4. for the purpose of placing, increasing, or decreasing a bet or

determining the course of play contingent upon that event or

outcome.]

[5. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by

the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find

the defendant guilty of gaming fraud (use of knowledge).

After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has

failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you should find the defendant not guilty of gaming fraud (use of

knowledge).

History

COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
crim-2026-02-25
Content hash
54e2e51a658a2998017151fed31b13dc51ef1d3c7d4f0cb65744b6a143c95854
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.