CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 18:87
MAKING, DISTRIBUTING, OR POSSESSING A COUNTERFEIT DRUG IMPLEMENT
The elements of the crime of making, distributing, or possessing a
counterfeit drug implement are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly or intentionally,
4. made, distributed, or possessed a punch, die, plate, stone, or
other thing designed to print, imprint, or reproduce the
trademark, trade name, or other identifying mark, imprint, or
device of another or any likeness of any of the foregoing upon
any drug or container or labeling thereof.
[5. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of making, distributing, or possessing a counterfeit
drug implement.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of making, distributing, or
possessing a counterfeit drug implement.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
f54d2409f4d0f563d71d2ca1d3f8c4388f7888daa52925a568575c99475d6de4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.